Pro-Parris Rank and Percentile:
1690-1695
Name | Petition | 1690 Rank | 1690 Percent | 1695 Rank | 1695 Percent |
Abby, Samuel and son | Pro-P | 61 | 25.20% | 57 | 26.90% |
Chever, Ezekill | Pro-P | 48 | 51.50% | 39 | 59.60% |
Deale, John | Pro-P | 50 | 40.40% | 57 | 26.90% |
Elliott, Frances | Pro-P | 88 | 5.00% | 97 | 4.80% |
Flint, ensigne Thomas | Pro-P | 9 | 91.90% | 12 | 88.40% |
Fuller, Thomas Junr | Pro-P | 11 | 87.80% | 17 | 81.70% |
Goodell, Zach: senr & son | Pro-P | 11 | 87.80% | 14 | 85.50% |
Hadlock, John | Pro-P | 61 | 25.20% | 57 | 26.90% |
Haines, Thomas | Pro-P | 24 | 76.70% | 27 | 71.10% |
Holton, Henry | Pro-P | 61 | 25.20% | 57 | 26.90% |
Similar to the procedure previously used to analyze persisters, rank and percentile analysis can be applied to see how individuals who paid taxes in both 1690 and 1695 fared during that period.
Users may work with the 1690 and 1695 tax data sets or with the 1690 and 1695 tax columns of the Tax Comparison Data Set. Once the rank and percent columns for the tax assessments of 1690 and 1695 are created, use the "Autofilter" on the "Petition" column and choose "Pro-P." (Users can further apply a "Custom Filter" to both the "1690 Rank" and "1695 Rank" columns: select "is greater than or equal to" in first field and select the lowest number (1) in second field button to provide a list of only those who paid taxes in both years.)
As before, percentile changes are noted only if they measured 10% or more. The information can be recorded in an adjacent column labeled "10% Change," and the results entered as "Up," "Down," or "No Change."
To see the results for pro-Parris taxpayers, click Next.